LEONOR FINI

 

      ©tedorè




A life as consummate as any canvas she ever painted; untamed, unyielding, of staggering beauty, and composed on her own sovereign terms. 



She arrived in the world on the 30th of August, 1907, in Buenos Aires, born of a Triestine woman of German, Slavic and Venetian blood and a wealthy, tyrannical Argentine of southern Italian ancestry, and already, from the very first breath, she belonged to several worlds at once and to none of them entirely. This originary impossibility of singular belonging became the very marrow of her nature, the invisible architecture beneath everything she would ever paint, wear, love, or refuse. Within eighteen months of the birth, her mother, Malvina, took the infant and fled back to Trieste, the only city she could call home. The father, Herminio Fini, a pious despot who held the marriage like a weapon he refused to sheathe, finally wrested the divorce from an Italian court only in 1919, and sent men repeatedly to retrieve the child. And so something happened that would leave its mark on little Leonor's entire life, something that in retrospect feels less like misfortune than like destiny wearing a disguise: until her seventh year, whenever she left the apartment, she went out dressed as a boy. The first act of the masquerade was survival. The love of transformation, the fascination with costume, the sense that identity is something one inhabits rather than something one simply receives, all of it began there, on the streets of a Habsburg port city, in clothes that belonged to the wrong gender and perhaps to the truest self. 




Trieste, the city where she grew up, was no ordinary place to form a consciousness. Poised at the dissolving edges of several empires - Habsburg, Slavic, Venetian - it possessed a peculiar density of spirit, as though all those competing cultures had compressed themselves into something volatile and brilliant. James Joyce wrote the early coils of Ulysses in its cafés and cramped apartments; Italo Svevo and Umberto Saba moved through the cultured bourgeois household Malvina kept as friends and regular guests; Rainer Maria Rilke haunted the nearby coastal landscape, composing his Duino Elegies within earshot of the Adriatic. Elsa Morante, who would become one of the great Italian novelists of the century and one of Fini's most devoted friends, would later write of her: "Then comes Leonor. Windows become light, cobwebs turn into precious curtains of clouds and stars, dry branches become lit candelabras, and the evening becomes a grand occasion, because Leonor unites two graces: childhood and majesty." The child absorbed languages, literatures, and borderlands with the appetite of someone who already understood, instinctively, that beauty lives precisely where boundaries soften and bleed into one another. 



The schools of Trieste expelled her one after another, for irredeemable rebelliousness. In their place, she received the finest education imaginable: her uncle's library, where she found the Pre-Raphaelites, Aubrey Beardsley, Gustav Klimt, the Flemish masters, the elongated Italian Mannerists; those painters of the sixteenth century who distorted the body into something stranger and truer than realism ever allowed. Their stretched, otherworldly figures gave her the first grammar of form she would ever trust. And then she did something that almost no one else would have considered: she persuaded a keeper at the local morgue to admit her, so that she might draw the dead. She was still an adolescent. "Children must see beautiful things," she reportedly told the man. She sketched cadavers, studied anatomy as Michelangelo had studied it; from the material of flesh itself, without intermediary, without sentimentality. The dark was her first teacher, and it taught her everything she ever needed to know about light. 



An eye disease in her early teens, rheumatic conjunctivitis, forced her to wear bandages over both eyes for two months. That deprivation turned inward and became, paradoxically, a gift: during those weeks of enforced blindness, she discovered she could construct and inhabit elaborate interior images with complete clarity, that the imagination, left alone in the dark, builds its own illuminated rooms. When the bandages came off, those rooms remained, fully furnished. She moved through them for the rest of her life, and one can see them in every painting she ever made: the dreamlike interiors, the half-ruined architectural spaces, the landscapes that feel at once archaeological and entirely invented. 



At seventeen, she left for Milan, studied briefly under the painter Achille Funi, exhibited for the first time in Trieste, and already understood with the absolute certainty of the very young that she would live precisely as she wished. At eighteen, she had decided she would share her life with a community rather than a single person. "Since I was eighteen," she told the art historian Whitney Chadwick in 1982, "I have always preferred to live in a sort of community, a big house with my atelier and cats and friends, one with a man who was rather a lover and another who was rather a friend. And it has always worked." This was her nature from the very first, as settled and unalterable as her talent. 

In 1931, she came to Paris, the only city in the world generous enough to hold her, because it held everything. Giorgio de Chirico, who already knew her work from Milan, introduced her to his circles, and through those circles the world opened. Max Ernst became her lover. Through Ernst, the Café de la Place Blanche received her: André Breton holding court, Salvador Dalí and Gala beside him, Paul Éluard, Man Ray, Henri Cartier-Bresson, and Georges Bataille arranged in the electric atmosphere of a movement that believed in the revolution of the unconscious. She arrived. She astonished. And she submitted to no one. 



Her first encounter with the Surrealists, on her own terms, was the declaration of everything that would follow: Leonor Fini appeared at a meeting in the scarlet robes of a Catholic cardinal, purchased from a shop specialising in clerical vestments in Rome. Asked why, she replied that she wanted to know how it felt to wear the clothes of a man who would never know a woman's body. It was a statement simultaneously theatrical, erotic, philosophical, and wickedly funny; the whole of Fini contained in a single gesture. Paris made her a legend almost at once. Breton offered her formal membership in the Surrealist movement. She declined, not out of indifference to its ideas, which she lived with every breath, but from a profound conviction that no manifesto, no charter, no male authority had the right to define the territory of her imagination. She found his misogyny both known and intolerable; she was aware of his reported tendency to demand that members of his own circle marry rather than transgress sexual convention. Her biographer Desmond Morris called her an "antagonistic Surrealist", an artist who inhabited the movement's deepest territories while refusing to salute its general. She exhibited in every major Surrealist show from 1936 onwards, regardless, and was included in Peggy Guggenheim's landmark 1943 exhibition of thirty-one women at Art of This Century in New York, alongside Frida Kahlo, Leonora Carrington, Kay Sage and Dorothea Tanning,  always on her own terms, always arriving as herself. 



And Paris adored her. She dyed her hair blue, orange, red, and gold, sometimes all in succession. She attended gallery openings dressed as a priest, or draped in a Siberian wolf-fur coat she had exchanged for a painting, or wearing nothing beneath it at all. At one such opening, alongside Leonora Carrington, who arrived equally prepared, she opened the coat when a guest remarked on the heat, and both women revealed simultaneously that they wore nothing whatsoever underneath. George Hoyningen-Huene photographed her in nothing but black feathers. Henri Cartier-Bresson, during a road trip taken across Europe with the writer André Pieyre de Mandiargues, photographed her naked in a swimming pool; an image that sold at auction in 2007 for $305,000, the highest price paid for any Cartier-Bresson work at that time. She was, without question, her own finest creation, and she inhabited that creation with the complete, unselfconscious sovereignty of an artist who sees no distinction between life and art. 



Elsa Schiaparelli understood this immediately and lent her clothes to be seen in, knowing that the body of Leonor Fini was the best advertisement the maison could have. The friendship produced one of the most recognisable objects in the history of perfume: in 1937, Fini designed the torso-shaped bottle for Schiaparelli's scent Shocking, modelled on the curves of Mae West's body, a woman's form as vessel, as architecture, as provocation. It was sealed with a monogrammed "S" and ringed at the neck with small fabric flowers. She was also sketching fashion designs for Vogue and Harper's Bazaar, and in 1939, she curated the inaugural exhibition at the very first gallery of her childhood friend Leo Castelli; that Leo Castelli who would, three decades on, become the great dealer of the American avant-garde. Her contribution to his opening was a corset chair in mother-of-pearl, its form uncannily echoing the perfume bottle: the female body made habitable, made furniture, made art. 



To understand Leonor Fini, one must enter her paintings, and entering them is unlike entering anyone else's work. Her canvases are inhabited by a world of creatures who exist between states: women who are part lioness, part goddess, part nocturnal bird; men who sleep passive and tender beneath their vigilant gaze; sphinxes who watch over desert landscapes where the only trace of previous life is scattered bones and wilted flowers. The recurring theme, as one scholar observed, is passage, continuity rather than rupture, a contagion that moves from one time to another, one body to another, one state of being to another, always without violence, always with that particular quality of the inevitable. She called her most characteristic works "ceremonies", chosen actions, she explained, where disorder, ugliness and incoherence are rejected and abolished. The ceremony of the image. The ritual of the brush. 



The sphinx above all. It appears in her work from the late 1930s through to the final decade of her life, the figure she returned to as other painters return to the nude or the landscape, as the inexhaustible subject, the one image large enough to contain everything she wanted to say. So consumed was she by painting the creature from within her own imagination that in 1951 she travelled to Egypt to stand before the originals carved in their colossal stones, and recognised herself without surprise.
For the male Surrealists around her, the sphinx had served as the femme fatale, the dangerous Other, the mystery that destroys the man who cannot solve it. Fini reversed the myth entirely. Her sphinxes carry their own intelligence and authority; they preside, they protect, they watch. In Shepherdess of the Sphinxes (1941), the painting that Peggy Guggenheim acquired at Max Ernst's urgent request, after he saw it in Fini's Monte Carlo studio, a lone woman stands in an arid, apocalyptic landscape in a kind of metal breastplate that draws the eye simultaneously to her vulnerability and her power, surrounded by her pride of sphinx-creatures. Broken bones and cut flowers litter the ground: the remnants of the sphinxes' feasts, the traces of their appetite. The shepherdess gazes into the distance, beyond the canvas, beyond the viewer. She knows more than anyone else in the scene. She always will. 



In Sphinx Amalburga (1942), a male figure lies limp and surrendered in the arms of a sphinx who wears Fini's own face; the self-portrait as both predator and protector. In Stryges Amaouri (1947), a man lies in the foreground, draped in ivy, while the female figure behind him radiates an alertness that is at once maternal and charged with unspoken desire, her gaze turned toward the viewer in a way that is deliberately, naturally, voyeuristic, and entirely without scandal. Fini explained the sleeping men: she believed that men had allowed the duties of work, social life and war to anaesthetise them to the life of the spirit. They slept in her paintings because they had chosen, in the waking world, to remain unconscious. 



The sphinx also bore her most private grief. In September 1947, she underwent a hysterectomy. She later said she had been glad of the operation -"the thought of having children horrifies me"- yet the painting she completed the following year, Little Hermit Sphinx (1948), reveals another layer of feeling altogether. The sphinx sits in her own ruined dwelling with eyes downcast, wearing a black cloak. Before her, a broken eggshell confirms what will never come. Above her, hanging from the doorframe, is an organ that appears at first to be a lung but reveals itself, on longer looking, to be something else entirely; the artist's own removed womb, displayed with the precision and the strangeness of a still life. The walls are in tatters. Bones and decaying leaves surround the figure. It is a painting of mourning for a particular kind of womanhood; and simultaneously, in its extreme technical exactness, its Gothic elegance, its refusal to sentimentalise, it is among the most powerful self-portraits of the twentieth century. She grieved, in her art, the loss of a status she had chosen to relinquish: the woman as life-giver, the woman as origin. The broken egg was her own symbol; in other paintings, it remained whole and incandescent, guarded by a high priestess in a desert. Here it lies in pieces at the sphinx's feet. 




She had also, throughout the wartime years in Rome, been building the circle of human friendships that would feed her work and her life with extraordinary richness. Anna Magnani became a close friend, wearing Fini's costumes when she performed Carmen at the Quirino Theatre in November 1944. Luchino Visconti was part of her world. Alberto Moravia and Elsa Morante were constant companions, and Morante's devotion to Fini, "my beautiful enchanted owl," as she called her, invoking Athena's bird, symbol of intelligence and charisma, was among the most sustaining relationships of both their lives. Federico Fellini was drawn into her orbit, and her talent as a writer and visual storyteller contributed ideas to the early drafts of La Dolce Vita. Pier Paolo Pasolini was a kindred spirit. Around her, the century arranged itself not as an audience but as a constellation, each mind drawn in, each one in some way changed by the proximity.



Jean Genet, who had written the first critical essay ever devoted to her work and for whose early books of poems she had made drawings and two portraits, addressed her in 1950 with the sharpest letter she ever received: "You go to the masked ball, masked with a cat's muzzle, but dressed like a Roman cardinal; you cling to appearances lest you be invaded by the rump of the sphinx and driven by wings and claws." He saw what perhaps even she could see only in her paintings: that beneath the spectacle was something still more radical, still more ungovernable, and that the costumes and the performances were simultaneously its expression and its protection. It was the most penetrating letter anyone ever addressed to her, and she carried its charge into the next decade of her work, into every sphinx that watches from every canvas, calm and inexhaustible and entirely unmoved.



The cats belong to any true account of her. Throughout her life, she lived with them, as many as twenty-three at once, Persian cats whose illnesses could drive her into genuine depression and whose deaths she mourned as she mourned the deaths of people. They shared her bed, walked across the dining table to choose morsels from the plates of guests, and occupied the apartment with the complete authority of beings who understood that the space belonged to them. They appear in her earliest paintings and in the work of her final years, a continuous presence more faithful than ideology, more honest than almost any human relationship. Elsa Morante shared her passion for Persian cats, which deepened their bond further. For Fini, the cat was a creature of the other reality, one that moved through the visible world while perceiving something the human eye had long since been trained to overlook. 



In 1942, in Monte Carlo, she met Stanislao Lepri, a Count of old Roman nobility serving as the Italian consul in Monaco, at that point still in the service of the Fascist government. She persuaded him to abandon his career. He did so without apparent struggle, and it was the most consequential decision of his life. Together they eventually settled in Paris, where the household expanded in January 1952 when she met, in Rome, the Polish writer and essayist Konstanty Aleksander Jeleński - Kot, born in Warsaw in 1922, fifteen years younger than she, a man of formidable intellectual range who led the Eastern European division of the Congress for Cultural Freedom and contributed prolifically to the great émigré journal Kultura. She discovered, to her private delight, that Kot was the illegitimate half-brother of a certain Sforzino Sforza, who had been among her most beloved lovers and who had served as the model for the passive, beautiful male nudes in several of her canvases. In October 1952, Kot moved into the Paris apartment. The three remained from that point inseparable, all bisexual, all committed to a life that answered only to its own internal law. An assistant later described it as "a little bit of prison and a lot of theatre." The inner circle widened to include the American painter Richard Overstreet and the Argentine poet Juan-Bautista Piñero. It was a self-assembled family that required no blood, only devotion, only the willingness to live without the ordinary maps. 


Summers brought them to a ruined monastery in Nonza on Cap Corse, where Dorothea Tanning and Max Ernst came to stay, and where Fini arranged celebrations among the deconsecrated stone walls above the sea; small, private ceremonies, rituals of her own invention, the kind of occasion that seemed to arrive already half-legendary.  



Her contribution to the theatre and the art of performance runs across decades and genres and cities and remains to this day one of the least adequately celebrated aspects of her work. She designed sets and costumes for over seventy productions in Paris between 1946 and 1969 alone: for the Paris Opera, for George Balanchine's ballet Le Palais de Cristal, for Maria Callas at La Scala in Milan, for Racine's Bérénice, for Wagner's Tannhäuser. The ballet Les Demoiselles de la Nuit, danced by the young Margot Fonteyn in 1948 for Roland Petit's Ballet de Paris, was clothed entirely in Fini's imagination. The following year, she conceived Le Rêve de Leonor, a ballet she designed herself, which Frederick Ashton choreographed, and Benjamin Britten scored, her hybrid human-animal figures translated into movement and music. For Fellini's 8½ in 1963, she designed costumes; for John Huston's A Walk with Love and Death in 1968, she designed again, and this was the film that marked Anjelica Huston's debut on screen. She illustrated approximately fifty books, among them a 1944 edition of de Sade's Juliette, works by Genet, Baudelaire, Poe, and Shakespeare, and the notorious Histoire d'O; illustrations that brought her a particular kind of fame among those who understood them fully and a particular kind of discomfort among those who did not. She also, in the 1970s, wrote three novels, as though the other arts had grown insufficient to contain the interior life. 



Stanislao Lepri died in 1980. Kot Jeleński died in 1987. Fini wrote of this condition with the simplicity of someone who has moved beyond complaint into something starker: "I, always sad myself, prefer the present, and it has become the past." Her late paintings grew darker, more relentless, more ancient-feeling. In Ex Voto of 1994, a woman holds a great white cat before frightened figures rising from a pool of dark water. In Vice Versa, painted two years before her death, two masked figures stand bound together foot to foot for eternity; a figure of indissoluble union, of the companionship that survives even dissolution. Pain became painting, as it always had. The cats remained. Her assistant Rafael Martinez and Richard Overstreet remained. A commissioned portrait of Paul and Linda McCartney, finished shortly before Lepri's death, was rejected by their agent in 1980 as too precise and too sad, a judgment that reads now, in full knowledge of what Fini was, as an inadvertent and magnificent compliment. 



On the 18th of January, 1996, Leonor Fini died in Paris of pneumonia, aged eighty-seven. She was buried alongside Stanislao Lepri and Konstanty Jeleński, outside the city. Three in one grave, as they had been three in one life. In 2021, her 1938 self-portrait Autoportrait au Scorpion sold for 2.3 million dollars, almost four times its estimated value. In 2022, she stood among the presiding spirits of The Milk of Dreams at the Venice Biennale. The world has begun, slowly, to recognise what she was. 



She always knew. "In a sense," she said once, "my paintings have always been my autobiography. They unmask a being that lives inside of me." The mask and the interior: in Leonor Fini, they were always the same thing, always equally real, always equally necessary. The child who crossed Trieste dressed as a boy, learning that the surface is its own form of truth. The girl who drew cadavers and learned that beauty lives even where life ends. The woman who gazed at her own face in the features of every sphinx she ever painted, asking the question the sphinx was never obliged to answer; and painting it, answering it, living it, in canvases that outlast everything that once tried to define or diminish or contain her. The sphinx of Buenos Aires, of Trieste, of Paris, of the century. She left no riddles. Only paintings. Only light.

©tedorè

No comments:

Post a Comment